Mike's Thoughts

MySpace. Just hearing that word makes me shutter. A few years ago, I drank the MySpace kool-aid and created a page of my own. It was the coolest thing since sliced bread. But then I realized just how trashy the site had become. More than half of the site had become riddled with ads. And if I should spend the hour or so to Ad-Block all of the images and text ads, I was left with a horrible shell of a site that had more white spaces on it than any site I’ve ever seen.

So, I decided to give Facebook a try. It has far less ads and had a more promising interface and API. However, after learning from my roommate that they had changed their Terms of Service, I have a different opinion of them. According to a post on Consumerist, Facebook now claims that by uploading content to their servers, you are granting them the right to use your content for whatever they want, indefinitely. They don’t need your permission to do so. Here’s the best part: if you close your account, or even if you delete content from your page, they still keep a backup of the content to use whenever they want. This angers me. A lot. So much, in fact, that I may be soon closing my Facebook and demanding that they remove my content from their servers, unless they want a fight.

Why is this an issue for me? Well, besides the obvious fact that Facebook is essentially stealing my intellectual property (stealing, according to Merriam-Webster is “to take surreptitiously or without permission.” Me uploading to your site is NOT giving you the right to backup my content for your own personal use whenever you feel like it!), they are doing it behind users’ backs. According to their privacy policy, if they make changes to their Terms of Service or Privacy Policy, they will either notify users at the top of the Privacy Policy page, via email, or their homepage. Let me tell you, a change like this can’t be contained to a freakin’ tiny line at the top of the Privacy Policy (which, by the way, has an effective date well before the aforementioned changes). If this is the kind of company Facebook is turning into, I want nothing to do with them.

Though I haven’t made a true decision, I am going to be reviewing content on my profile, and if need be, demanding in writing, that the content has been removed. For your own sake, look through your profile for any content that you wouldn’t want Facebook using as if it were their own, and remove it, and write them to make sure that it really is gone. And from now on, make SURE that you really want your content submitted to Facebook before you post it.

Todd, though I might not have agreed with your position on some of the aspects of the new facebook layout, I can see why you are timid of Facebook! Facebook, you are headed down a dark path!

So, for those of you who have not heard, the music industry just fell about 10 pegs in my book. Between Ruckus shutting down, XM in peril with the potential of shutting down, and then XM telling me that in less than a month, I will no longer get to listen to my music online for free anymore.

Let’s start with Ruckus. It was a simply concept… give college students free music for them to listen to. Sure, it had DRM on it that restricted you to listening it only on your computer, but it was music none-the-less. Now, I know certain people who will whine about DRM until the end, but I argue that DRMed music that is legally obtained is better than nothing, or need I say, pirated music. Unfortunately, because the service was not generating enough revenue from ads, they were forced to shut down. Great… now where am I going to get my music from?!

Now onto XM. I’ve got mixed feelings on this one. Part of me is sad for them that they might be shutting down. However, after logging in to listen to XM Online, since I’m at college and don’t have a radio in my room, I was presented with a lovely message that in less than a month, online radio would no longer be free! >:| Now comes the job of convincing certain parental units to spend the extra $3 a month so that I can continue to listen to “now near CD quality” music online. Nonetheless, I hope that they can get their affairs in order so that my backup source of music doen’t meet the sam fate as Ruckus.

So for those of you who didn’t see Steve Balmer’s presentation at CES last night, the big news was that Windows 7 will be released as a public beta TOMORROW (Friday). I’ll be eagerly awaiting the opportunity to download and try out this new OS! If You would like to see the keynote, visit http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/events/ces/default.aspx

Otherwise, stay tuned tomorrow to http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/default.aspx for your chance to download Windows 7!

Windows Live. You may have heard of it, but how much do you really know about it? Microsoft, in an effort to slim down its Windows 7 installation, has decided to take a different direction. No longer will you find the OS bloated with applications, like Mail, Movie Maker, or Photo Gallery, that you may never use. The idea is that users who want, and will actually use these applications, can download them for free from Live.com.

However, although Windows 7 is still a way from being released, many of the Live services are available for download right now. Although I have professional video organization/tweaking software (Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom), I decided to give Live Photo Gallery a try. This is the same product featured on the “Mojave” commercials. I also decided to give Live Writer a try. Here’s what I found out.

Windows Live Writer

Live Writer serves one purpose, and it serves it well: blogging. Writer connects to a Live Spaces blog, a SharePoint blog, or virtually any other blogging platform in seconds. I’m even writing this post, which as you know is powered by WordPress, in Writer. It connected to my blog with three pieces of information: the URL, my username, and my password. That’s it. Now, I did need to enable an option in my settings, but Writer told me exactly what needed to be enabled and where to enable it.

After connecting to the blog, Writer temporarily creates a blank post, so that it can download information about your blog, including themes, categories, and more. When you are ready to create a post, you actually see your theme, with the text overlaying it, in the appropriate fonts and colors relating to your theme.

The interface allows for easy additions of pictures, hyperlinks, tables, maps, tags, videos, and more. Additional items can be added to your posts via Plug-ins that can be added to Live Writer. The interface also has one click access to your WordPress Dashboard, blog comments, as well a link to your blog itself.

All in all, this is a very feature rich application that allows you to easily create blog posts from within a professional feeling application, which also allows you to save local copies of your blog posts, just in case something happens.

The only issue I found with this service is that my host does not like the way Live Writer uploads the images that I put in my posts. To remedy this, you simply configure the account to upload via FTP instead of directly to the blog. (If you need help with this, please post a comment, and I will provide detailed instructions).

Windows Live Photo Gallery

Windows Live Photo Gallery is very similar to Windows Photo Gallery, which is included in Windows Vista. Live Photo Gallery allows you to organize, tag, and fix your photos. The big difference between the Vista and Live versions is that the Live version allows you to automatically create panoramas from your photos with surprising accuracy. The results are similar to a panorama created with Adobe Photoshop. Obviously they are not as good, but they are quite impressive. The major issue with the Live panoramas is that they do not do any sort of optimization or color correction with the photos, so they can appear slightly off. However, for what they are, they are quite good.

Below is a group of five photos that I took, not intending to create a panorama. I created one using Live Photo Gallery and one using Adobe Photoshop CS4. Judge for yourself.

The originals

The panorama generated with Live Photo Gallery (above)

The panorama generated with Adobe Photoshop CS4 (above)

Ok, so if you’re here, then you are hear to read my thoughts. That’s the point of a blog. If you are a die hard Mac/Apple Fanboy (or Fangirl) who can’t stand to read something bad said about their idol, stop. Do not pass go. Do not continue reading.

Ok, so I’ve obviously peaked your interest if you’re reading this!

Let me start by saying that I do own a mac. I don’t deny that they are nice looking machines, and my 1 year old aluminum iMac is no exception. Ok, enough praising this sad excuse for a secure computing machine.

Let me paint you a picture. On my mac, I have several accounts. I am obviously an administrator on my machine. Now, sense I’m at college, my family borrows my computer, no problem, cool. My brother is an administrator on the machine, as is my dad. My dad, for whatever reason, does not have a password protecting his account. My machine doesn’t contain the answer to life or the formula to eternal youth, so I don’t really care. This point aside, I recently came to discover something that I would consider a huge security issue and a complete blunder on Apple’s part. For those of you who know Windows, you know that when User A locks their computer, only User A can truly unlock the system. If another administrator logs into the system, it will “unlock” the computer, which really means that the user is logged out, and the system returns to the logon screen. Now, on a mac, if User A locks their system… oh wait, I’m sorry, they can’t! The only way to “lock” the computer is to require a password when the system returns from sleep or a screen saver. Sorry, that’s not the same thing. But, whatever. Now, let’s say that User A locks their system, and an administrator comes to unlock the system. When they enter in their credentials, it does not log out the user, but instead returns them to User A’s session. Hello! Um…. yeah, I don’t care if you are an administrator, you should not be logged into my session where you now have free rein of my system to snoop through my files, change settings, send love letters to that girl in the cubical two rows over in my name, and change my background… don’t TOUCH my background!

Ok, so you’re prolly thinking in your head, HELLO, administrators have access to your files anyway. That’s why they’re administrators. Duh! Well, um, no. NTFS permissions on Windows, as well as the permission schema on the Mac allow users to explicitly deny a group of users access to your files. Without going into too much detail about file security (it can be a doosy), there are two ways to prevent a user or group from accessing a file or folder. You can either explicitly deny the user, or you can simply not define access for them, which will prevent them from accessing the resource. Oh, but wait, the administrator is now parading around my mac as ME, so it doesn’t matter that he doesn’t have access to my files, my mac thinks it’s ME installing 50 GB of software onto the system. Good job!

Now, there might be a way to change the way this logon/unlocking protocol is handled, and I have just not changed it. However, if that is the case (which I don’t think is), the better question is what dim-witted programmer DIDN’T ENABLE IT BY DEFAULT!?!?

This is only the tip of the iceberg on the way I feel about Mac security. I have bashed Microsoft before and said things about Vista and other Microsoft products, but I can say one thing with certainty. That company is not afraid to admit vulnerabilities and flaws in its products and provide prompt updates for them. Every second Tuesday of the month comes the famed Patch Tuesday where Microsoft pushes out important and critical patches to its customers. It does not try to hide these flaws. I don’t care what you think about Microsoft, you CAN NOT deny that it is looking out for the best interest of its customers. Apple on the other hand… refuses to admit flaws in its supposedly “perfect” operating system. Critical flaws can take months at a time to patch, often met with denial from company personel about the alleged issues. Don’t believe me? Read this ComputerWorld: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9110907

It’s crap like this from Apple that makes me want nothing to do with them. Once you get over the wow factor of their, admittently decent looking products, you will see that you are paying for overpriced crap. For the same price, you can get a PC with twice or three times the specs as the mac. I thought that it would be cool to work at Apple. After doing some digging on their business practices, and the horrible way that Steve Jobs treats his employees, I don’t want anything to do with them.

In a class a few weeks ago, we saw a video about the modernization of technology, including the first Apples and the first computers. I caught an early glimpse at how Steve Jobs views innovation, and it made me want to put my fist through a wall. I saw him talk about how he has not a care about how he and his company took specifications from Xerox all those years ago to create the first real GUI and the early macs. Yet, today, Apple whines and complains when Window starts to look “like a mac” <shutteres>. Or better yet, when a company proposes a way of organizing pictographic program depictions, we’ll call them icons, into a straight line, or container, and puts this container along one side of the screen, that’s copying the “Dock.” Hmm, I should probably remove the red box at the bottom of my desktop background into which I organize my icons, because, you know, that looks an awful lot like the Dock. >:/

I’m done watching keynotes where Jobs freaks out at the audience because the guy in the back row took more than 5 seconds to look at the “innovative”, “amazing” new Mac Pro casing that Jobs insisted everyone see. I always thought Apple products were cool, that they were imprevious to security breeches, and that they were made by a company that stood for innovative, original ideas; one that respeced its employees, and valued that interests and opinions of its consumers.

Althought I will probably continue to look out for what next product Apple tries to insist that everyone “can’t live without,” I know that once the potential wow factor wears off, I’ll be left with nothing.